Random Yet Deterministic !

I think to understand the Deeper Aspects of Realities like Consciousness, the basic Definitions of Modern Science needs to broadened !   It seems to me a Self- Referential Foundational issue in some way : The Principles of Modern Science were established by the Minds of Legends/Physicists like Galileo("the father") and Other Scientists subsequently because of Consciousness in their Brains at first place !  So, to establish the Origin of Consciousness using those derived principles that were established because of Consciousness only,might be inconsistent /incomplete foundationally !  Is the Universe Fabric of the Consciousness?  Paradox of Self Consciousness  I deeply believe that even inanimate objects have senses of its own type  though they appear so.They  do have consciousness of their own.   

*In Real Life/World, Managing the Unknown ,Uncertainty, Unpredictability, Randomness is practically more important than acquiring knowledge and Predicting the things . The reason being ,no matter how much one knows, the Knowns will always remain relatively less than the Unknowns in the Universe* There needs to be the balance between knowledge and managing Uncertainty...

Scientific Explanantions of Intuitions, Patience,Time Brain waves, The Path of Uncertainty Over Certainty as the Possible Better Path of Gain Over the longer run. Human Brains tend to achieve the Shortest Possible Path where different types of causal forces including randomness leads to generate the resultant one. There are two types of forces : one positive driven by higher conscious state of human brains where better quantum entanglement signals generate where deep intuitions originally generate. Intuitions are nothing but those energy vibrations that generates thoughts by energy vibrations inside the brain technically. Another opposing force which tries to work fast at the lower level of consciousness having natural components like emotions and impulse etc.. These two causal forces/forms of energy fight against each other to reach at the result. At higher level of Consciousness i.e., higher stage of brain’s wave vibrations the positive ones weigh heavily on the negative ones. By ...

Law of Human Behaviour Dynamics: Decision Making under Uncertainty: Scientific Dynamics: Principle of Least Action: Law of Nature Author : Pankaj Mani New Delhi, India Contact: manipankaj9@gmail.com 10th September 2023 Abstract : In this paper, I try to look at Human Behavior Decision Making Under Uncertainty from the Scientific Dynamics Perspective of how an individual essentially follows the Principle of Least Action which is conceptually equivalent to traveling the Path of Maximum Stability/Utility. But unlike the Conventional Economic Utility Theory by Legendary John von Neumann+ Oskar Morgenstern and the Prospect Theory by Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, it looks at scientifically the Governing Law of Human Behaviour. Then one can see how popular economic theories might not be necessarily valid always scientifically as proposed by the learned greats. Blindly following Economic Theories based on Historical Pattern Analysis in the Backward Directi...

Equation of Human Behaviour dynamics under Uncertainty Daniel Kahneman's theory is Prospect Theory, for which he won the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002. The theory focuses on how humans make decisions when facing risk, particularly financial risk. The theory states that individuals don't maximize utility but react to possible or perceived changes in gains or losses, which are short-term and emotional. The approach of Expected Utility Theory which was shown by Kahneman to be not valid for human behaviour based on empirical pieces of evidence. I try to show the entire episode from a scientific perspective what is possibly true or not. I have already explained in my other paper that the way the Conventional Statistical Theory of Expectation(mentioned above) as the Summation of All the Probability-weighted Outcomes might not be valid always in different scenarios, especially Human Behavioural Dynamics in the Real World. In fact, Human Behavior does follow the Pa...

Action S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\left(KE-PE\right)dt Remember that the PE and KE are both functions of time. For each different possible path you get a different number for this action. Our mathematical problem is to find out for what curve that number is the least. Now to find out in Context of Human Behaviour how to Calculate The Action/ Utility /Value function/ Most Stability that neds to be minimized or maximized. Action/Energy/Stability= f(Relative, Value, Risk, Causal Weight, Probability, Time Period Preference, Idiosyncratic behaviours, etc..) Note: Every Human Behaviour follows the Law of Nature, Energy like Physics(if not exactly). So all these general behaviors put by Kahneman has Energy Causes. Like higher-order analysis (model-independent approach by Taleb), rather than trying to find out the absolute value of the function f ( ) and its output, trying to find out which path gives the maximum stability relative to other paths or least action. So, How the Effective ...

No matter which language, Truth can't be completely and consistently described in any language as long as they are verbal or written...